Skip to content

Evolution and Challenges of Corporate Governance in India

Corporate governance in India has made significant strides but continues to face numerous challenges. The evolution from colonial times through economic liberalization and into the current era of globalization and digital transformation shows a trajectory marked by substantial reforms and ongoing adjustments. The path forward involves refining governance frameworks to enhance transparency, accountability, and inclusive management practices.

Historical Evolution of Corporate Governance

Pre-Independence Era

  • Context: Governed by the Companies Act of 1866 and subsequent amendments, Indian corporate entities operated under colonial guidelines.
  • Challenges: Ownership structures were often fragmented and management practices unprofessional, leading to inefficient resource use.

Post-Independence (1950s)

  • Legislative Changes: Introduction of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act and a new Companies Act.
  • Focus Areas: Emphasized the production of essential goods and cost analysis to rebuild and modernize the economy.

1960s to 1980s

  • Industrial Growth: Establishment of heavy industries and integration of cost, volume, and profit analysis into business practices.
  • Economic Context: These decades marked a period of industrial expansion influenced by centralized planning and government involvement.

Coming of Age

  • Global Integration: By the late 20th century, India emerged as an attractive market for global organizations. Proactive adoption of corporate governance practices by dynamic Indian firms set the stage for regulatory changes.

Reformation Phases

First Phase (1996-2008)

  • Reforms: Initial reforms focused on enhancing the independence and effectiveness of audit committees and boards, aimed at better supervision over management and protection of shareholders' interests.

Current Issues in Corporate Governance

Board Composition and Selection Procedures

  • Challenge: Compliance with diversity requirements (including independent and women directors) is often superficial, with many appointments influenced by existing board members or company insiders.

Term and Performance Evaluation

  • Concern: Board members typically serve short terms, and performance evaluations are not publicly disclosed, impacting long-term strategic planning and accountability.

Independence of Directors

  • Issue: The intended impact of independent directors is undermined by their selection and removal being controlled by promoters, questioning the effectiveness of this reform.

Stakeholder Engagement and Liability

  • Problem: Boards often try to limit their accountability towards broader stakeholder interests and environmental responsibilities, contrary to legislative mandates.

Promoter Dominance

  • Influence: Family-owned companies often show a reluctance to dilute control, which can impede impartial and professional corporate management.

Transparency and Data Protection

  • Risk: The balance between transparency and competitive risk is delicate in the digital age, requiring robust data protection to prevent misuse.

Internal Structure and Environment of Mistrust

  • Internal Conflicts: Multi-layered management structures can hinder effective communication and decision-making.
  • Trust Issues: Frequent corporate scandals have eroded public and investor trust, affecting the overall business environment negatively.
Ask Hive Chat Chat Icon
Hive Chat
Hi, I'm Hive Chat, an AI assistant created by CollegeHive.
How can I help you today?
🎶
Hide